« August 2005 | Main | October 2005 »

September 20, 2005

Here Comes the Peak?

Sooner or later, oil production in the world is going to peak and then go into a long, slow decline. If you understand that getting oil from underground rock strata is not like pumping it from a tank but like wringing it from a sponge, you know that you get a lot of easy oil early in a field's life. Later, you still have plenty of oil in the ground, but it takes more and more effort to wring it out. U.S. and North Sea oil locations have already peaked. The Middle East is a bit more of an unknown because Saudi Arabia is very secretive on the subject, but evidence based on the salinity of Saudi oil indicates that the peak isn't far off. One of the first things to look for is for OPEC to give up on quotas. That will happen when they can no longer maintain the illusion that they have plenty of spare capacity. Well, it looks like it may have just happened:

The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries pledged all its remaining extra capacity, or an additional two million barrels of oil a day amounting to 7 percent of the group's output, in a last-ditch attempt to bring prices down from their record highs. Source: NY Times

Can they deliver? Time will tell. It looks to me like an excuse for stepping aside from the quotas without having to announce that they are very close to being unable to pump that much anyway.

I want to mention one other thing here. I keep hearing from some that the solution is more drilling. However, we don't know of any other large, untapped reserves. Yes, we can go drilling in the arctic. That is expected to yield about a 10 month supply of oil for the U.S. at current consumption rates. However, the field will actually have to be pumped dry over the usual lifetime of a field -- say about 40 years. So that's 100% of our needs for 10 months if we could pump it like it was in a tank. However, since it will actually be pumped over a 40 year period, it will (on average) provide for about 2% of our needs over that time provided we have NO growth in consumption. Overall, new drilling is just not going to put a sizable dent in our needs. Time to get our heads out of the sand and make the move to newer technologies (electric-ethanol hybrids, perhaps?). Putting more rigs in our wildlife refuges and off our beaches is NOT going to save us: it's just going to spoil our beaches and endanger wildlife we'd hoped to protect.

It's like flooding in New Orleans: everyone knew the Big One was going to happen sooner or later, but no one wanted to pay for levees then that would protect the city now. If we don't start moving away from our dependence on oil NOW, we'll have an economic and political crisis on our hands as we fight over an ever-dwindling supply.

September 17, 2005

Threshold: Don't Cross It

The new television sci-fi series Threshold premiered last night with good reviews from the NY Times. Good enough that my daughter and I made sure to watch it (and to record it for Elizabeth to watch later).

Don't bother. CBS is looking for a show to answer ABC's success with Lost: a spooky, otherworldly, smart show that doesn't underestimate it's audience.

Unfortunately, they don't get it. It's Lost-like on the surface, but completely lacks Lost's depth. Characters are shallow: a loner female "worst-case scenario planner", an unreformed hippie scientist, a devoutly Christian engineering/physics type, a "tough outside / tender inside" James Bond-type, and a mathematician/linguist hard-drinking/womanizing... wait for it ... midget.

For all the terrible 2D characters, they still couldn't keep them "in character". The loner and the Bond-guy are obviously a future love story as they emit pheromenes that don't require smell-a-vision to sense, the hippie wants to know if he's getting paid, and the devout Christian seems scared to death of the unknown.

Did I mention that the scientists keep getting the science wrong? That contradictions run unbridled through the show?

What does Lost have that Threshold lacks?

Interesting, complex characters. An internally consistent plot and personalities. The understanding that a little bit is often scarier than a lot.

CBS "gets" the fact that Lost is a HUGE hit (and for good reason), but they don't have a clue why. Maybe they can turn it around in the next few episodes, but I don't plan to give them the benefit of the doubt on this one. Too bad... first contact can be a great premise.

September 15, 2005

Accountability? We meant for THEM, not US!

I'm spitting mad!

Republicans talk at length about "responsibility" and "accountability" and about "trust" and "integrity".

Today, a vote in the Senate was called to form an independent, bipartisan commission to look into what went wrong in our government's response to Hurricane Katrina. The Republicans, instead, are seeking a "bipartisan" commission with a strong majority of the members being Republican.

EVERY REPUBLICAN SENATOR (except for La, who did not vote) VOTED AGAINST AN INDEPENDENT INQUIRY.

Whitewash! Cover-up! Playing politics while an American city lies in ruins and hundreds to thousands of citizens have died. UNBELIEVABLE!

Both my Republican senators have received angry emails from me. I hope the whole wretched bunch gets swamped with such messages. This is a horrible disgrace.